Let us begin by acknowledging that this is a rancorous period, full of clashing agendas, bewildered onlookers, and all too many innocents caught in the crossfire (although it is not the first time we’ve seen these storms, nor will it be the last.). And that right now making an eligibility post particularly mentioning Hugo Award categories like Related Work is something that some of us are circling and wondering about.
And my answer is yes. Yes, you should. Why?
Because it helps people discover the work that you’re proud of. You know what you wrote. You know what you want to make sure they see. It’s okay to say, “Hey, if you’re looking to read something by me, I would try this.”
Because it helps people read widely. Every writer in F&SF should — well, I don’t want to make it seem mandatory so I won’t say that you must do this, but you should at least feel free to make eligibility posts. So when someone’s poking around, they can find your stuff and read it.
Because you shouldn’t self-censor out of modesty when talking about your work. You are its best champion. Go ahead and help people find the best examples of it. Be humble and lovable in some other way. (Thank you to Erin M. Hartshorn for the link to the piece of self-effacement.)
And so, I’ve finally been prodded by a Twitter conversation into doing my own in part because I want to say to you, no matter where you are sited in the bizarre and incredibly wordy conflicts, that you should do it. Let’s have lots of wonderful reading lists, the more the merrier, and part of creating those is making readers aware of what you (and others, sure) have done. Please feel free to post a link if you’ve made an eligibility post. Yup, even if you think you’re not welcome. You are.
Novel: Kevin J. Anderson’s excellent Wordfire Press published my first novel, Beasts of Tabat, the first in a fantasy quartet. SFWA members can find a copy of it up in the 2015 Fiction forum. There have been some nice Amazon reviews, but I know the book isn’t everyone’s cup of tea and there’s been some awesome awesome novels published in 2015. *goes back to read that self-deprecating piece again and quickly moves on*
Novella: Nothing this year, but wait till you see the one Bud Sparhawk and I have coming up in Abyss & Apex!
Novelette: Also nothing this year.
Short story: As always, plenty of stuff here. The pieces that I am proudest of are Primaflora’s Journey, which appeared in Beneath Ceaseless Skies, “The Subtler Art”, which appeared in Blackguards: Tales of Assassin,s Mercenaries, and Rogues, edited by J.M. Martin, and “Marvelous Contrivances of the Heart,” which appeared in Fiction River: Recycled Pulp, edited by John Helfers. I am glad to send a copy of the latter two to any requester.
Please feel free to comment and include a link to your own eligibility post. In this coming week, I’ll also be posting a list of my favorites from 2015, but there are so many it may take a while, plus I’m still reading a few.
Hey Cat. Not only is my Advanced SF&F Workshopped story “She Gave Her Heart, He Gave Her Marrow” eligible, I’m apparently in my first year for the John W. Campbell.
I don’t think there’s anything crass about sharing work you are proud of, and trying to win awards. Writing can be such a lonely slog sometimes, any recognition of the work that goes in is wonderful.
For consideration: THE SYNOPSIS TREASURY. Published by WordFirePress on Feb 2015, it took me ten years to compile never-before-seen actual synopses submitted by major SF-Fantasy authors to industry, to show fans and writers how they got published. Including: H.G. Wells, Frank Herbert, Robert Heinlein, Terry Brooks, Orson Scott Card, Andre Norton, Joe Haldeman, David Brin, Connie Willis, Margaret Weis, Robert J. Sawyer, Sara Douglass, Julie E. Czerneda, Jack Williamson, Ben Bova, Kevin J. Anderson, and many others. Very diverse styles, careers, genders and tastes. Includes a foreword by former VP and Editor-in-Chief of Del Rey, Betsy Mitchell.
I think THE SYNOPSIS TREASURY would be eligible for Best Related Work. It’s a shot in the dark, considering such powerful competition, but I’m very proud of this unique book and this is probably my only shot. 🙂
Thanks for this! As a fan I really appreciate it. Christmas is my slow time at work and year end round-ups really help me find great stuff that I missed.
Want access to a lively community of writers and readers, free writing classes, co-working sessions, special speakers, weekly writing games, random pictures and MORE for as little as $2? Check out Cat’s Patreon campaign.
"(On the writing F&SF workshop) Wanted to crow and say thanks: the first story I wrote after taking your class was my very first sale. Coincidence? nah….thanks so much."
~K. Richardson
You may also like...
Guest Post from Anne Leonard: Writing "Strong Female Characters" in a Patriarchal Secondary World Fantasy
In Dorothy Dunnett’s sixth book, Checkmate, we get this passage:
She had been led into behaving like a female. And she was being dismissed as a female. But she had charge of his good name, although he might not know it; and she had work to do, although, like a fool she had lost sight of it.
Here we see the character of Philippa Somerville in all her complexity: determined, strong, imperfect, aware of her role in her culture and refusing to be limited by it. Philippa is a prime example of the “strong female character” existing in a patriarchal world, and although the novel is historical rather than fantasy, it and its companions have a lot to teach about writing strong women without giving up the conventions of a patriarchal social structure.
Yes, this is another post about writing “strong female characters.” I am coming to this issue from the position of someone who likes traditional epic fantasy with pseudo-medieval (or at least pre-industrial) cultures. This is my comfort read, and it is what I like to write. This is partly because that was what I grew up on, partly because I’m enough of a romantic to still have a soft spot for heroes, and partly because I like to interrogate that social structure. For me, interesting female characters are the ones who have to face social oppression ““ the same social oppression I do ““ and who fight against it within the limitations of their own beliefs about their roles. Feminist fantasy with matriarchal or egalitarian societies isn’t as interesting to me as a writer because it avoids the very problems I want to get my teeth into ““ what is a woman to do when oppressed? What if she doesn’t know she’s oppressed?
Agency
One of the problems faced by fantasy writers who consider themselves feminist but like to write about secondary worlds based on historically patriarchal cultures is the disconnect between the oppressive culture and the strength of the female characters. This disconnect is why people tend to fall into the assumption that a strong female character has to be a Brienne of Tarth, acting like a man.
That assumption leads to the argument that a strong female character is not historically accurate. Under this logic, because there aren’t lots of historical episodes of women going around acting like epic heroes, there’s no need for a strong female character in epic fantasy. Aside from the silliness of saying fantasy has to be historically accurate, the problem with this argument is that there are lots of different kinds of strong women in history. What makes a woman a strong character is not her physical prowess (though it could be); it’s her agency. The character’s agency is where the clash between oppression and strength is negotiated.
Consider The Handmaid’s Tale; most of Offred’s narrative is describing how she is being subjugated in Gilead and remembering what it was like before. She’s not fighting back or leading a revolution. No one would say she’s not a strong female character, though, because she has voice, feelings, thoughts, memories, and choices. Her agency is internal, in how she responds to the situation in which she is caught. (And if you haven’t read The Handmaid’s Tale, why not? Go read it!) Even if the character accepts the stereotypically gendered roles of her culture, she has to make decisions, and these decisions have to have consequences. This is almost a basic rule of writing, regardless of the character. Something needs to be at stake to move her story forward.
Examples
Some of the best examples of dealing with the disconnect between a patriarchal power structure and a strong female character are historical novels about real women with real power. The Lymond Chronicles (6 books, beginning with The Game of Kings) by Dorothy Dunnett are far and away my favorites.
Set in Scotland, England, France, Turkey, Russia, and some other places during the period between Henry VIII’s death and Elizabeth I’s accession to the crown, Dunnett’s books are amazing for their historical detail, storytelling, intelligence, and characters. In the fourth book, Pawn in Frankincense, Dunnett writes one of the most devastating scenes that I have ever read, leaving George R.R. Martin looking cuddly by comparison. (The books can be read individually, but the reading experience will be much richer taking them in sequence.)
The women’s stories include the growth of Philippa Somerville, a gentleman farmer’s daughter, from child to adult; the consequences of a love affair 30 years past; estrangement between a mother and her son; the unhappiness of a young merchant woman who despise herself and the people around her; and a woman who endures abuse because of her devotion to the cause of an independent Ireland. One woman is a courtesan who has considerable power over powerful men. Several women are queens or courtiers. These books show how women with power wield it (the mother of Mary Queen of Scots is described as having “the thick oils of statesmanship” oozing through her veins), and they also present women who don’t necessarily have political or legal power but have power of personality and rich, complicated lives.
Significantly, the women are not all likeable. (Nor are the male characters, for that matter.) Mary Tudor comes off as rather pathetic, Margaret Douglas is scheming and power-mad, the Dame de Doubtance is a creepy astrologer without a shred of empathy. The younger Philippa is at times frustrating to read because she is absolutist who makes some bad decisions with significant consequences. The strong female character doesn’t have to be the heroine. She doesn’t have to be perfect. But she does have agency, and her choices matter.
These women also aren’t the sixteenth century equivalent of suffragettes or bra-burners. They don’t question the sexual double standard, they don’t don armor and go to battle, they don’t talk about being oppressed or fight overtly against it. (And yes, in one sense it’s kind of absurd to talk about a queen being oppressed ““ but on the other hand, it’s quite clear that no one is very comfortable with power lying in a woman.) While some of them engage in activities that don’t fit our idea of what women did in the sixteenth century, that’s only a part of them. They are living full and complex lives within the patriarchal society, rather than rebelling. A strong female character can, like Philippa, be aware of being “led into behaving like a female” and put that behind her without questioning her internalized conception of being a female. A strong female character is something feminist readers want, but the character doesn’t have to be a feminist to fit the bill.
Dunnett is not the only writer of historical fiction with strong and interesting female characters. Here are a few recent other books which should satisfy anyone looking for “historical accuracy” in trying to decide what role women should play in epic fantasy:
Hild, by Nicola Griffith. This is based upon the life of the woman who became St. Hilda of Whitby. Set in 7th century Britain, the book is thick with historical and physical detail. It presents the life of women who are family of the Anglo-Saxon kings, including slaves and women of lower rank. Hild is a mystic who both does women’s domestic tasks and leads men in battle. She is bisexual; she is listened to by men but is forced into a marriage; she has complicated relationships with the people around her.
Shadow on the Crown and The Price of Blood, by Patricia Bracewell. These two books are about Emma of Normandy, who in 1002 was married as a teenager to AEthelred the Unready and became a queen of England. In many ways Emma does not have power compared to the men around her, but she fights for what she can get and she uses it. She is a survivor — she was a Queen of England for over 30 years, to two different kings.
Theodora ““ Empress, Actress, Whore and The Purple Shroud, by Stella Duffy. These two books chronicle the life of Theodora from her childhood as a sex slave to her death as the Empress of Byzantium in 548. The title The Purple Shroud refers to a speech made by Theodora which is said to have inspired Justinian to put down a revolt rather than to flee Constantinople. Theodora is an interesting character because of how she rises through the social ranks and because of her forceful personality.
Wolf Hall and Bring Up the Bodies, by Hilary Mantel. Although these books are largely the story of Thomas Cromwell, advisor to Henry VIII, they include as characters Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, and Cromwell’s wife and sister. They depict the ways women interact with powerful men. The relationship between Cromwell and his wife Liz is nicely drawn, and Liz, like Dunnett’s Philippa Somerville, is a good example of a woman on the fringes of political power who has her own agency.
Sharon Kay Penman has written too many historical novels about English royal families for me to list here, but her first, The Sunne in Splendour, is notable for its portrayal of Anne Neville, wife of Richard III, which is almost 180 degrees from Shakespeare’s portrayal of the same. Edward IV’s wife Elizabeth Woodville is also a strong ““ and unlikeable – character. Penman’s novel When Christ and His Saints Slept is about Matilda of England (Empress Maude) and her war to gain the English crown in the early to mid 12th century.
In sum, the writer of epic fantasy can keep full-blown patriarchal power structures and ideologies as part of the world-building. But history is rife with stories about women in such worlds who also have power, agency, and complex lives. Putting such characters into the epic fantasy world is only going to enrich and deepen it.
Bio: Anne Leonard has been writing fantasy and other fiction since she was fourteen and finally, after a career with as many detours as Odysseus, published her first novel, Moth and Spark, in 2014. She has a lot of letters after her name that are useful when trying to impress someone. She lives in Northern California. Her website is www.anneleonardbooks.com. She can be found on Twitter at @anneleonardauth and on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/anneleonardbooks.
I’m finishing up a story for the Glitter and Mayhem anthology, involving the Midwestern town I grew up in and lesbian were-seals. Here’s what may be the opener.
Here’s Anna and I all through high school: a geeky Hispanic theater boy and a bushy-haired white girl whose geekery took the form of endless D&D games and scores of tattered lurid paperbacks.
Here’s us a few years later, both in the same community college. Still best friends, still sharing trials and tribulations, always with an unspoken question between us, all on Anna’s part, because I knew the answer.
And here’s when I finally answered it, and broke Anna’s heart.
75 Responses
@djolder @ErinMHartshorn @ShvetaThakrar Huzzah! https://t.co/osJkE4pjg5
@Catrambo @djolder @ErinMHartshorn *cheer*
@Catrambo @ErinMHartshorn @ShvetaThakrar yay!
@Catrambo @ErinMHartshorn @ShvetaThakrar https://t.co/44a6UMrh53
Stephen Gordon liked this on Facebook.
RT @Catrambo: To Eligibility Post or Not to Eligibility Post?: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
RT @Catrambo: To Eligibility Post or Not to Eligibility Post?: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
RT @Catrambo: To Eligibility Post or Not to Eligibility Post?: https://t.co/2H609TkLRC
Aden Romine liked this on Facebook.
Danielle Myers Gembala liked this on Facebook.
Sharon Joss liked this on Facebook.
Jessica Wolf liked this on Facebook.
RT @Catrambo: To Eligibility Post or Not to Eligibility Post?: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
To eligibility post or not eligibility post? https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF TL;DR version: Yes, you should.
RT @Catrambo: To eligibility post or not eligibility post? https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF TL;DR version: Yes, you should.
RT @Catrambo: To eligibility post or not eligibility post? https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF TL;DR version: Yes, you should.
Newly updated – To Eligibility Post or not to Eligibility Post https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated – To Eligibility Post or not to Eligibility Post https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated – To Eligibility Post or not to Eligibility Post https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated – To Eligibility Post or not to Eligibility Post https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF
Carla Dugas liked this on Facebook.
Spencer German Ellsworth liked this on Facebook.
To Eligibility Post or Not to Eligibility Post? (With a list of more …) https://t.co/qjqX57wxDF
Since you ask: First Do No Harm, Strange Horizons, November 16. It’s a novelette by about 70 words.
Not sure it deserves a Hugo, but on the other hand, I’ve always dreamed of being a Hugo Loser and getting invited to one of GRRM’s parties.
This is a nice idea. My own eligibility post is at http://andrewhickey.info/2015/11/09/award-eligibility-post/
Hey Cat. Not only is my Advanced SF&F Workshopped story “She Gave Her Heart, He Gave Her Marrow” eligible, I’m apparently in my first year for the John W. Campbell.
Post here:
http://www.ravenbait.com/2016-awards-post/
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated – To Eligibility Post or not to Eligibility Post https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF
@djolder @Catrambo @ErinMHartshorn And at long last, here is mine! https://t.co/h5pD0T7BHW @michaeldthomas
@ShvetaThakrar @Catrambo @ErinMHartshorn @michaeldthomas yay!
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated – To Eligibility Post or not to Eligibility Post https://t.co/osJkE4GUEF
My eligibility post: http://www.labyrinthrat.com/journal/2016/and-my-own-2015-recap-and-award-eligibility-post/
@Catrambo @djolder @ShvetaThakrar Finally made a post with my 2 eligible short stories. (WHY so long for so little?) https://t.co/6CuQVpym4W
I tried commenting a few days ago but it got lost somewhere.
Anyway. I put my first ever eligibility post up here:
http://www.ravenbait.com/2016-awards-post/
If you’re looking for lots to read, @Catrambo has a list of eligibility posts here: https://t.co/w5rMseLXZc
@TheLizLincoln @mattw59 Here is mine: https://t.co/3gD1lrV6ig
And here are…everyone’s:
https://t.co/ZBYWqknACq
Eligible for awards this year? I’m happy to link to your post about it here: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
RT @Catrambo: Eligible for awards this year? I’m happy to link to your post about it here: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
RT @Catrambo: Eligible for awards this year? I’m happy to link to your post about it here: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
Thank you so much for doing this! Mine is recs + eligibility, here:
http://aliettedebodard.com/2016/01/11/awards-eligibility-and-recs-post/
Hi Cat! I’ve got my eligibility post up here: http://marleejaneward.com/2016/02/04/hugo-eligibility/
I don’t think there’s anything crass about sharing work you are proud of, and trying to win awards. Writing can be such a lonely slog sometimes, any recognition of the work that goes in is wonderful.
RT @Catrambo: Eligible for awards this year? I’m happy to link to your post about it here: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
RT @Catrambo: Eligible for awards this year? I’m happy to link to your post about it here: https://t.co/r4CgqTt3CO
Newly updated compendium of awards eligibility posts, (72 of them now): https://t.co/2mMWKYuWQj
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated compendium of awards eligibility posts, (72 of them now): https://t.co/2mMWKYuWQj
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated compendium of awards eligibility posts, (72 of them now): https://t.co/2mMWKYuWQj
A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated compendium of awards eligibility posts, (72 of them now): https://t.co/2mMWKYuWQj
@aliettedb @Catrambo thanks for sharing this, I find these so helpful in remembering all the great work out there while nominating.
RT @Catrambo: Newly updated compendium of awards eligibility posts, (72 of them now): https://t.co/2mMWKYuWQj
@aliettedb @Catrambo oh blimey. I’ve been so busy I haven’t done one for my eligible works yet 🙁
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
@EmApocalyptic @Catrambo you can still do it (for the Hugos?)
. @aliettedb @Catrambo My post is here: https://t.co/cvWkz10z3A
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
RT @aliettedb: A couple PSAs: @Catrambo has collected eligibility posts here https://t.co/5BG8GtyrZU
@aliettedb @Catrambo yeah, I will try 🙂
@catvalente @ac_wise and @Catrambo have both been compiling lists of eligibility lists! https://t.co/3qLl0RiUih https://t.co/gBZzq5HD0N
For consideration: THE SYNOPSIS TREASURY. Published by WordFirePress on Feb 2015, it took me ten years to compile never-before-seen actual synopses submitted by major SF-Fantasy authors to industry, to show fans and writers how they got published. Including: H.G. Wells, Frank Herbert, Robert Heinlein, Terry Brooks, Orson Scott Card, Andre Norton, Joe Haldeman, David Brin, Connie Willis, Margaret Weis, Robert J. Sawyer, Sara Douglass, Julie E. Czerneda, Jack Williamson, Ben Bova, Kevin J. Anderson, and many others. Very diverse styles, careers, genders and tastes. Includes a foreword by former VP and Editor-in-Chief of Del Rey, Betsy Mitchell.
I think THE SYNOPSIS TREASURY would be eligible for Best Related Work. It’s a shot in the dark, considering such powerful competition, but I’m very proud of this unique book and this is probably my only shot. 🙂
Thanks for this! As a fan I really appreciate it. Christmas is my slow time at work and year end round-ups really help me find great stuff that I missed.
Hi @Catrambo –
https://curiousful.wordpress.com/2016/12/27/eligibility-2016/